what a real content framework looks like
Less about controlling the story. More about staying in it.
A few days ago, I wrote about why content strategy feels like a scam. It hit a nerve — not because it was a revelation, but because it put words to something a lot of people were already feeling.
Some of you asked: if strategy isn’t the answer, then what is?
There’s a difference between having a content strategy and having a content framework.
One keeps you busy. The other builds something.
Here’s how you tell the difference.
most strategies sell formats. real frameworks build logic.
It’s not about “how often should we post?”
It’s about:
what do we believe in?
what world are we trying to build?
what behavior are we trying to shift — in the audience, the market, or ourselves?
You can’t control the feed. You can build something people want to find.
most strategies are additive. real frameworks are selective.
A weak strategy says: do everything.
Educate. Entertain. Sell. Trend-chase. Be human. Be a meme. Be a lifestyle. Post tips. Post stories. Post behind-the-scenes. Post hot takes. Post until nobody cares.
It’s not a strategy. It’s a checklist. And a checklist doesn’t build meaning. It just fills space.
A real framework makes you choose. Not because you can't do it all — but because you shouldn't. It forces you to focus. Pick the few things that actually matter. Go deep enough that people feel it. Stay long enough for it to mean something.
It’s all about having a point of view — and the discipline to ignore everything else.
most strategies assume stability. real frameworks expect change.
People change. Platforms change. Culture changes.
If your strategy can’t survive a new algorithm or a trending format, it was never a strategy.
It was a phase. A real framework doesn’t fall apart every time Instagram has an identity crisis. Or every time Elon Musk buys something.
It’s built to handle shifts — not by chasing them, but by expecting them. It’s structured enough to stand. Flexible enough to move.
You don’t pivot every quarter. You evolve without panicking.
most strategies are brand-first. real frameworks are context-first.
It’s not just about what you want to say. It’s about where you’re saying it. What scroll you’re interrupting. What mood the person is in when they find you.
Are they bored?
Busy?
Doomscrolling?
Looking for a laugh?
Trying to forget their day?
If you don’t account for that, it doesn’t matter how good your message is. It’ll get swallowed up like everything else.
Consistency doesn’t win. Context does.
most strategies try to sound like a brand. real frameworks make the brand sound human.
People don’t connect with logos. They connect with tone. With rhythm. With familiar cues. With small rituals they recognize without thinking.
A real framework doesn’t teach you to "sound on-brand." It teaches you to sound like someone they'd actually want to hear from. Someone they might even look for.
It’s not about being consistent. It’s about being believable.
And no — your audience isn’t dumb. They know when they’re being marketed to.
They know when it’s empty. Respect their time. Their taste. Their intelligence.
Or else you’ll lose them.
most strategies are made to get approval. real frameworks are made to make sense.
Somewhere along the way, agencies stopped building frameworks. They started building decks.
They stopped leading.
They started agreeing.
Today, most agencies don’t offer strategy. They offer compliance.
You want a trend map? Here’s three.
You want a content calendar? Here’s twelve months.
You want to post five times a week? Absolutely.
You want a brand voice guide with emojis? Coming right up.
No questions asked. No real point of view. Just deliverables. And honestly — it’s easier that way.
Easier to get the contract.
Easier to get the renewal.
Easier to keep everyone “aligned.”
But at some point, you have to ask:
If you’re just giving clients what they want — and not what they need — what are you actually building?
Because frameworks aren’t built by saying yes. They’re built by asking better questions. And sometimes, by saying no.
Superb. Well said. 💪
(And the approach you describe is the kind of thing it's impossible for AI to deliver.)
This is great, thanks for sharing